Synonyms | 3-[(2S)-1-Methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl]pyridine (2R,3R)-2,3-Dihydroxybutanedioate Hydrate; ?Nicotine Tartrate Dihydrate; (S)-3-(1-Methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)pyridine (2R,3R)-2,3-Dihydroxybutanedioate Dihydrate; (S)-3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)pyridine [R-(R*,R*)
|
InChI | InChI=1S/C10H14N2.2C4H6O6.2H2O/c1-12-7-3-5-10(12)9-4-2-6-11-8-9;2*5-1(3(7)8)2(6)4(9)10;;/h2,4,6,8,10H,3,5,7H2,1H3;2*1-2,5-6H,(H,7,8)(H,9,10);2*1H2/t10-;2*1-,2-;;/m011../s1 |
Reference | <div>
1. BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Oct 8;7:11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6904-7-11.Pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy from randomized controlled trials of 1 and 2 mg nicotine bitartrate lozenges (Nicotinell).Dautzenberg B(1), Nides M, Kienzler JL, Callens A.</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
BACKGROUND: The use of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) can almost double the chances of success for smokers to quit. Nevertheless, there is still a considerable number of cessation attempts that are made without any treatment. This novel oral formulation,(lozenge containing nicotine bitartrate dihydrate) has been developed to enlarge the offer for efficient smoking cessation drug therapies, assuming that increasing treatment options will bring more smokers to find the support they personally need to stop smoking.</div>
<div>
METHODS: Three pharmacokinetic (PK), one safety and two efficacy studies were carried out with Nicotinell lozenges. PK trials were: (1) a single-dose, three-way crossover study comparing 1 and 2 mg lozenges with 2 mg nicotine gum; (2) a multiple-dose, two-way crossover study comparing 1 mg lozenge with 2 mg gum; (3) a multiple-dose, three-way crossover study comparing 1 and 2 mg lozenges with 4 mg gum. Safety trial: (4) a single dose study to assess the safety of swallowing up to 12 lozenges containing 1 mg nicotine. Efficacy trials: two efficacy studies in (5) France and (6) the USA, including more than 900 smokers followed-up for up to one year, conducted with the 1 mg lozenge.</div>
<div>
RESULTS: The results of the individual PK trials showed that the 1 mg Nicotinell lozenge is bioequivalent to 2 mg polacrilex gum, as demonstrated by similar blood PK parameters (tmax, Cmax, AUC). The 2 mg lozenge was found to deliver quantities of nicotine that were intermediate between those delivered by 2 and 4 mg polacrilex gum. The short-term efficacy of the 1 mg lozenge in comparison with placebo was also demonstrated with significantly more subjects continuously abstinent from smoking with active lozenges on week 6 in two different populations: moderate to heavy smokers (FTND between 4 and 7) OR = 1.72 [95% CI: 1.05-2.80]; heavy to very heavy smokers (FTND 6 and over) OR = 2.87 [95% CI: 1.18-6.97]. Nicotinell lozenges were found to be safe with mainly mild and reversible adverse events. The safety of the 1 mg lozenge formulation, even when misused was also demonstrated.</div>
<div>
CONCLUSION: The data presented in this review demonstrate high nicotine bioavailability, excellent safety profile and proven short-term efficacy of Nicotinell lozenges. At nominal equivalent doses 1 and 2 mg Nicotinell lozenges were shown to deliver larger amounts of bioavailable nicotine compared to the nicotine polacrilex gum. According to the data developed here, the systemic exposure to nicotine could be ranked: 4 mg polacrilex gum > 2 mg Nicotinell lozenge > 1 mg Nicotinell lozenge = 2 mg polacrilex gum.Adverse events observed during the clinical trials were mild or moderate in severity, transient and completely reversible. With respect to efficacy in smoking cessation, significantly higher continuous abstinence rates were achieved with lozenge compared to placebo. In conclusion, Nicotinell lozenges offer a valuable addition to the therapeutic armamentarium available for smoking cessation.</div>
<div>
</div>
|