Tenatoprazole

For research use only. Not for therapeutic Use.

  • CAT Number: A000887
  • CAS Number: 113712-98-4
  • Molecular Formula: C16H18N4O3S
  • Molecular Weight: 346.405
  • Purity: ≥95%
Inquiry Now

Tenatoprazole(cas 113712-98-4), also known as TU-199, is a proton pump inhibitor drug candidate that was undergoing clinical testing as a potential treatment for reflux oesophagitis and peptic ulcer. Tenatoprazole has an imidazopyridine ring in place of the benzimidazole moiety found in other proton pump inhibitors, and has a half-life about seven times longer than other PPIs.


Catalog Number A000887
CAS Number 113712-98-4
Synonyms

TU-199

Molecular Formula C16H18N4O3S
Purity ≥95%
Target proton pump inhibitor
Storage 4°C
IUPAC Name 5-methoxy-2-[(4-methoxy-3,5-dimethylpyridin-2-yl)methylsulfinyl]-1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine
InChI InChI=1S/C16H18N4O3S/c1-9-7-17-12(10(2)14(9)23-4)8-24(21)16-18-11-5-6-13(22-3)19-15(11)20-16/h5-7H,8H2,1-4H3,(H,18,19,20)
InChIKey ZBFDAUIVDSSISP-UHFFFAOYSA-N
SMILES CC1=CN=C(C(=C1OC)C)CS(=O)C2=NC3=C(N2)C=CC(=N3)OC
Reference

1. Arzneimittelforschung. 2006;56(1):33-9.
<br>
Pharmacokinetics of tenatoprazole, a newly synthesized proton pump inhibitor, in
healthy male Caucasian volunteers.
<br>
Domagala F(1), Ficheux H, Houin G, Barré J.
<br>
Author information: <br>
(1)NEGMA-GILD, Magny les Hameaux, France.
<br>
The pharmacokinetics of tenatoprazole (CAS 113712-98-4), a newly synthesized
proton pump inhibitor, and its metabolites TU-501 (sulfide form) and TU-502
(sulfone form) were investigated in an ascending-dose parallel-group study at the
dose levels of 10, 20, 40, 80 and 120 mg. A total of 30 healthy Caucasian male
volunteers (6 in each dose group) received a single dose at Day 1 (fasted state)
and repeated doses from Day 14 to Day 20. CYP2C19 genotype status was determined
in all subjects. Concentrations of tenatoprazole, TU-501 and TU-502 in plasma and
urine were measured by a validated HPLC/MS/MS method. The single and
multiple-dose study provided reliable tolerance. After the single
administrations, plasma concentrations reached a maximum between 2.5 and 4.3 h
post dose, and thereafter decreased according to a terminal half live (T1/2)
ranging from 4.8 to 7.7 h. Similar T1/2 were obtained on first and the last
administration, and the steady state was reached after 5 days. Cmax and AUC
increased linearly between 10 to 80 mg. However, with the 120 mg dose, the
observed Cmax was higher than expected, especially at steady state. For TU-501
and TU-502 metabolites, Cmax and AUC increased linearly after repeated
administration between 40 and 120 mg.
<br>

2. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Mar 15;19(6):655-62.
<br>
Tenatoprazole, a novel proton pump inhibitor with a prolonged plasma half-life:
effects on intragastric pH and comparison with esomeprazole in healthy
volunteers.
<br>
Galmiche JP(1), Bruley Des Varannes S, Ducrotté P, Sacher-Huvelin S, Vavasseur F,
Taccoen A, Fiorentini P, Homerin M.
<br>
Author information: <br>
(1)CIC-INSERM, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France. [email protected]
<br>
BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors control gastric acidity better during the day
than at night, when nocturnal acid breakthrough can occur. Tenatoprazole is a
novel proton pump inhibitor with a seven-fold longer plasma half-life. Aim : To
compare the effects of tenatoprazole 20 mg (T20), tenatoprazole 40 mg (T40) and
esomeprazole 40 mg (E40) on intragastric acidity in healthy volunteers.
METHODS: This randomized, three-period, cross-over study enrolled 18 Helicobacter
pylori-negative volunteers, who received E40, T20 and T40 once daily for 7 days
with a 14-day washout between periods. Twenty-four-hour gastric pH monitoring was
performed on day 7. Serum gastrin was assessed on day 8.
RESULTS: T40 induced a more potent acid inhibition than T20 (24-h median pH: 4.6
vs. 4.0, P < 0.01; daytime: 4.5 vs. 3.9, P < 0.01; night-time: 4.7 vs. 4.1, P <
0.05). T40 was more potent than E40 (24-h median pH: 4.6 vs. 4.2, P < 0.05;
night-time: 4.7 vs. 3.6, P < 0.01); the pH > 4 holding time was higher during the
night for T40 than for E40: 64.3% vs. 46.8%, P < 0.01; the nocturnal acid
breakthrough duration was significantly shorter for T40 than for E40. No
significant gastrin increase was observed and all drugs were well tolerated.
CONCLUSION: T40 is significantly more potent than T20 and E40 during the night.
The therapeutic relevance of this pharmacological advantage deserves further
study.
<br>

Request a Quote